Grammar of Infinity. Ludwig Wittgenstein's Critique of Set Theory
Abstract
The paper discusses a relatively underexamined element of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics associated with his critique of set theory. I outline Wittgenstein’s objections to the theories of Dedekind and Cantor, including the confounding of extension and intension, the faulty definition of the infinite set as infinite extension and the critique of Cantor’s diagonal proof. One of Wittgenstein’s major objections to set theory was that the concept of the size of infinite sets, which Cantor expressed by means of symbols אₒ and c, had no application, i.e. that there was no grammatical technique that could show how such expressions were to be used. Notions of set theory are, so to speak, exterior – they find themselves outdoors, outside of what we usually do. They form a discourse that takes us beyond the horizon of everydayness and commonality. They are like an engine idling of the language of mathematics.
Links
PhilArchive
This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.
Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 84,292
Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 84,292
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
Similar books and articles
Wittgenstein And Labyrinth Of ‘Actual Infinity’: The Critique Of Transfinite Set Theory.a Valérie Lynn Therrien - 2012 - Ithaque 10:43-65.
The influence of Spinoza’s concept of infinity on Cantor’s set theory.a Paolo Bussotti & Christian Tapp - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):25-35.
Ludwig Wittgenstein e i fondamenti della matematica. Quattro studi: Cantor, Dedekind, il Logicismo, la scoperta in matematica.a Emanuele Rainone - 2013 - Nóema 4 (2).
Les nombres réels: Frege critique de Cantor et de Dedekind/The real numbers: Frege's criticism of Cantor and Dedekind.a Jean Pierre Belna - 1997 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 50 (1):131-158.
Les nombres réels : Frege critique de Cantor et de Dedekind/The real numbers : Frege's criticism of Cantor and Dedekind.a Jean-Pierre Belna - 1997 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 50 (1-2):131-158.
Gesammelte Abhandlungen Mathematischen Und Philosophischen Inhalts Mit Erläuternden Anmerkungen Sowie Mit Ergänzungen Aus Dem Briefwechsel Cantor-Dedekind.a Georg Cantor, Richard Dedekind, Ernst Zermelo & Abraham Adolf Fraenkel - 1932 - Verlag von Julius Springer.
Wittgenstein on Cantor's Proof.a Chrysoula Gitsoulis - 2018 - In Gabriele M. Mras, Paul Weingartner & Bernhard Ritter (eds.), Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics: Contributions of the 41st International Wittgenstein Symposium. pp. 67-69.
Generalizations of Cantor's theorem in ZF.a Guozhen Shen - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (5):428-436.
Cantor’s Absolute in Metaphysics and Mathematics.a Kai Hauser - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2):161-188.
La notion de nombre chez Dedekind, Cantor, Frege. [REVIEW]a Philippe Nabonnand - 1999 - Dialogue 38 (1):208-211.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-09-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2023-09-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Home |
New books and articles |
Bibliographies |
Philosophy journals |
About PhilPapers |
API |
Contact us |
Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-665bdd4886-mwcw8 N